На мен ми хареса - Ед Харис, подводничарски трилър, меланхоличен, клаустрофобичен, с чувство за обреченост и без излишна драма. Да, не е нещо революционно, сюжетът е правен и преди, ама то явно си е имало такива случки. С една дума "Ловът на червения октомври" без драмата.
Има някакви мрънкотини, че в съветския флот не си викали "сър", ами "камарад", че онова било контейнеровоз, а не траулер, че на еди кой си кадър се виждала стълба, дето не трябвало да е там и т.н. Но педантите винаги ще намерят за какво да се закачат.
21 out of 25 people found the following review useful:
Decent sub thriller
7/10
Author: siderite from Romania
14 July 2013
I've read the reviews of others and I was surprised to see such a strong polarizing. People either loved or completely hated the film. I am no expert in Russian Navy protocol, subs or war in general, so that is probably why I liked it. I didn't like it too much, though; even if it has a stellar cast, it is rather average and that is how I will rate it. However I see it as a decent sub movie.
To summarize a few reviews, people hated the American actors that pretended to be Russians without Russian accents. That is so ridiculous that I will not even deign it with an analysis. If you can't like a story unless sugar spooned to you, then it's your problem. Then there were people that reported erroneous depictions of Russian life, beliefs and reality in the 60's. I can't argue with that, but then again, the slip-ups were minor and one can easily ignore them if having good intentions. The rest of the film was pretty much a combination of Red October and The Abyss (how come nobody noticed that?
) which were both movies I liked.
Bottom line: I considered this film a reasonable achievement, even before I learned it was an independent film with only 18$mil as a budget. I personally liked it and can't account for many negative issues with the movie. Is it awesome? No. But I had fun watching it and was not bored at all.
Decent sub thriller
7/10
Author: siderite from Romania
14 July 2013
I've read the reviews of others and I was surprised to see such a strong polarizing. People either loved or completely hated the film. I am no expert in Russian Navy protocol, subs or war in general, so that is probably why I liked it. I didn't like it too much, though; even if it has a stellar cast, it is rather average and that is how I will rate it. However I see it as a decent sub movie.
To summarize a few reviews, people hated the American actors that pretended to be Russians without Russian accents. That is so ridiculous that I will not even deign it with an analysis. If you can't like a story unless sugar spooned to you, then it's your problem. Then there were people that reported erroneous depictions of Russian life, beliefs and reality in the 60's. I can't argue with that, but then again, the slip-ups were minor and one can easily ignore them if having good intentions. The rest of the film was pretty much a combination of Red October and The Abyss (how come nobody noticed that?
) which were both movies I liked.Bottom line: I considered this film a reasonable achievement, even before I learned it was an independent film with only 18$mil as a budget. I personally liked it and can't account for many negative issues with the movie. Is it awesome? No. But I had fun watching it and was not bored at all.
) се биеха по-умело . Затова пък бяха предадени от командира си ,който рано се разболя от "морска болест" в резултат на приливите . Голяма борба със зареждането на винтовките , измъчиха актьорите , след отбиването на първата атака броненосецът "Шлезвиг-Холщайн" изсипа масиран огън по недобре съоръжените окопи на поляците и .....счупи две дървета 
затова и голямата разлика в жертвите . Ако имате 2 часа за губене и сте гледали всичко на военна тематика до втръсване или сте заклет полскофил , прежалете се . 
Leave a comment: